During the extensive two-hour conversation, Carlson, formerly of Fox News and now an online commentator, largely refrained from challenging Putin on critical issues such as Russia’s actions in Ukraine, allegations of war crimes, and the imprisonment of opposition figures like Alexei Navalny. Instead, Carlson provided a platform for Putin to propagate his version of events without significant scrutiny, allowing him to manipulate public opinion.

CNN’s chief international correspondent, Clarissa Ward, noted that it was evident from the outset that Putin controlled the narrative, with Carlson appearing to lack control over the interview. Putin even advanced conspiracy theories unchallenged, including the notion that the U.S. government is controlled by unelected agencies like the CIA.

Despite Carlson’s occasional mild challenges, such as advocating for the release of imprisoned journalist Evan Gershkovich, critics argue that his overall approach played into Putin’s hands. Russian state media quickly seized upon the interview, amplifying Putin’s messages and framing it as a triumph for the Russian leader.

This isn’t the first time Carlson has faced criticism for his stance on Russia. While once critical, his recent commentary has been more sympathetic towards Putin’s regime, prompting speculation about his motives for conducting the interview. Some journalists have accused Carlson of being used as a tool for Russian propaganda, while others have defended his efforts to secure the release of imprisoned reporters.

Regardless of the debate surrounding Carlson’s motives, the interview has reignited concerns about the spread of Russian propaganda and the role of Western media in amplifying it. As tensions between Russia and the West continue to escalate, the impact of such interviews on public opinion remains a topic of heated discussion.